Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
meeting_2018 [2018/04/23 12:31] vegahag [Session 3: Seismic acquisition and broadband seismic] |
meeting_2018 [2018/06/06 10:44] (current) vegahag |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| The meeting takes place 23rd—26th April, 2018 at P1 in PTS1, S.P. Andersens veg 15a, NTNU, Trondheim (See map below)\\ | The meeting takes place 23rd—26th April, 2018 at P1 in PTS1, S.P. Andersens veg 15a, NTNU, Trondheim (See map below)\\ | ||
| {{2018: | {{2018: | ||
| - | {{2018: | + | {{2018: |
| [[course_2018|Course 2018]] | [[course_2018|Course 2018]] | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| ^Time ^Title ^Author ^Company | | ^Time ^Title ^Author ^Company | | ||
| - | |09:40 | Understanding pore compliance and poroelasticity in reservoir (and beyond): A geophysical approach | Jared Atkinson | Colorado School of Mines | | + | |09:40 | Understanding pore compliance and poroelasticity in reservoir (and beyond): A geophysical approach |
| - | |10:00 | Rock Physics models for fractured rocks saturated with two immiscible fluids | Mark Chapman | University of Edinburgh | | + | |10:00 | Rock Physics models for fractured rocks saturated with two immiscible fluids |
| - | |10:20 | From B to A – the influence of subsurface injection or depletion on pore pressure in surrounding rocks | Rune M. Holt | NTNU | | + | |10:20 | From B to A – the influence of subsurface injection or depletion on pore pressure in surrounding rocks {{2018: |
| - | |10:40 | Rock physics characterization of a deep overburden shale | Audun Bakk |SINTEF| | + | |10:40 | Rock physics characterization of a deep overburden shale {{2018: |
| - | |11:00 | On some unsolved issues in shale rock physics - How do we model compaction, cementation and uplift of shales? | Per Avseth | NTNU/ | + | |11:00 | On some unsolved issues in shale rock physics - How do we model compaction, cementation and uplift of shales? |
| - | |11:20 | Can controlled laboratory experiments be linked to uplift estimation? | Sondre Torset | NTNU | | + | |11:20 | Can controlled laboratory experiments be linked to uplift estimation? |
| - | |11:35 | Relating static and dynamic stiffnesses of shales: effects of frequency and stress | Serhii Lozovyi | NTNU | | + | |11:35 | Relating static and dynamic stiffnesses of shales: effects of frequency and stress |
| - | |11:50 | Laboratory measurements of seismic attenuation | Stian Rørheim | NTNU | | + | |11:50 | Laboratory measurements of seismic attenuation |
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| ==== Session 2: Modeling, Processing and Anisotropy ==== | ==== Session 2: Modeling, Processing and Anisotropy ==== | ||
| ^Time ^Title ^Author ^Company | | ^Time ^Title ^Author ^Company | | ||
| - | |13:00 | Elimination of time dispersion from wave equation modelling in elastic and anelastic media | Lasse Amundsen | + | |13:00 | Elimination of time dispersion from wave equation modelling in elastic and anelastic media {{2018: |
| - | |13:20 | S-waves in acoustic TTI media | Jin Song | NTNU | | + | |13:20 | S-waves in acoustic TTI media {{2018: |
| - | |13:40 | Normal modes in an orthorhombic medium | Yuriy Ivanov | NTNU | | + | |13:40 | Normal modes in an orthorhombic medium |
| - | |14:00 | A new parametrization in acoustic orthorhombic media | Shibo Xu | NTNU | | + | |14:00 | A new parametrization in acoustic orthorhombic media {{2018: |
| - | |14:20 | Interaction of wave modes in layered orthorhombic media | Alexey Stovas | NTNU | | + | |14:20 | Interaction of wave modes in layered orthorhombic media {{2018: |
| == 14:40 Coffee break == | == 14:40 Coffee break == | ||
| ^Time ^Title ^Author ^Company | | ^Time ^Title ^Author ^Company | | ||
| - | |15:10 | Drift and attenuation on the NCS: A new look at an old approach | Andrew Carter | | | + | |15:10 | Drift and attenuation on the NCS: A new look at an old approach |
| - | |15:30 | Estimating velocities and layer thickness changes from diving waves | Izzie Y. Liu | NTNU | | + | |15:30 | Estimating velocities and layer thickness changes from diving waves {{2018: |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| ==== Session 3: Seismic acquisition and broadband seismic ==== | ==== Session 3: Seismic acquisition and broadband seismic ==== | ||
| ^Time ^Title ^Author ^Company | | ^Time ^Title ^Author ^Company | | ||
| - | | 15:50 | TopSeis, results of the 2017 Barents Sea campaign | Vetle Vinje | CGG | | + | | 15:50 | TopSeis, results of the 2017 Barents Sea campaign |
| - | | 16:10 | Signal-apparition based simultaneous source decoding | Johan Robertsson | ETH Zürich | | + | | 16:10 | Signal-apparition based simultaneous source decoding((Contact author for presentation)) |
| - | | 16:30 | Comparing video recordings of ghost cavitation to cavity modeling | Babak Khodabandeloo | NTNU | | + | | 16:30 | Comparing video recordings of ghost cavitation to cavity modeling |
| === 19:00 Dinner === | === 19:00 Dinner === | ||
| Line 63: | Line 64: | ||
| ==== Session 4: Time lapse and reservoir characterization ==== | ==== Session 4: Time lapse and reservoir characterization ==== | ||
| ^Time ^Title ^Author ^Company | | ^Time ^Title ^Author ^Company | | ||
| - | |09:00 | Calculation, | + | |09:00 | Calculation, |
| - | |09:20 | Gas leakage through shallow sediments – laboratory experiments compared to passive and active seismic field data | Martin Landrø | NTNU | | + | |09:20 | Gas leakage through shallow sediments – laboratory experiments compared to passive and active seismic field data {{2018: |
| - | |09:40 | Time-lapse refraction analysis monitoring shallow gas migration | Nora Løw Løhre | NTNU | | + | |09:40 | Time-lapse refraction analysis monitoring shallow gas migration |
| - | |09:55 | Using diving waves for time-lapse seismic studies and overburden characterization | Bjarte Foseide | NTNU | | + | |09:55 | Using diving waves for time-lapse seismic studies and overburden characterization |
| == 10:10 Coffee break == | == 10:10 Coffee break == | ||
| - | |10:40 | Estimating S-wave velocities and changes from tube waves | Daniel Wehner | NTNU | | + | |10:40 | Estimating S-wave velocities and changes from tube waves {{2018: |
| - | |11:00 | Identifying depleted areas and potential HSE-situations using overburden 4D time shifts | Thomas Røste | Statoil | | + | |11:00 | Identifying depleted areas and potential HSE-situations using overburden 4D time shifts |
| - | |11:20 | Time lapse analysis | + | |11:20 | Calculation |
| - | |11:40 | Net exhumation estimation using an effective-medium technique based on seismic traveltime measurement | R. J. Martinez & Kenneth Duffaut | NTNU | | + | |11:40 | Net exhumation estimation using an effective-medium technique based on seismic traveltime measurement |
| Line 81: | Line 82: | ||
| ==== Session 5: Imaging and inversion ==== | ==== Session 5: Imaging and inversion ==== | ||
| ^Time ^Title ^Author ^Company | | ^Time ^Title ^Author ^Company | | ||
| - | |13:00 | Full Waveform Ambient Noise Inversion | Korbinian Sager | ETH Zürich | | + | |13:00 | Full Waveform Ambient Noise Inversion |
| - | |13:20 | Verification of seismic modeling using laboratory ultrasonic data | Børge Arntsen | NTNU | | + | |13:20 | Verification of seismic modeling using laboratory ultrasonic data {{2018: |
| - | |13:40 | 3D Elastic seismic modeling using CUDA unified memory and gaming GPUs | Tore Sivertsen Bergslid | NTNU | | + | |13:40 | 3D Elastic seismic modeling using CUDA unified memory and gaming GPUs {{2018: |
| - | |14:00 | Ensemble based seismic inversion methods | Jo Eidsvik | NTNU | | + | |14:00 | Ensemble based seismic inversion methods |
| == 14:20 Coffee break == | == 14:20 Coffee break == | ||
| ^Time ^Title ^Author ^Company | | ^Time ^Title ^Author ^Company | | ||
| - | |14:50 | Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty in EFWI Using the Hessian Matrix | Vegard S. Hagen | NTNU | | + | |14:50 | Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty in EFWI Using the Hessian Matrix |
| - | |15:10 | Sewing the Born approximation into the finite difference scheme with interpolation to model small-scale structures | Ivan Karpov | NTNU | | + | |15:10 | Sewing the Born approximation into the finite difference scheme with interpolation to model small-scale structures |
| - | |15:30 | Sensitivity and cross-talk for Q-estimation | Marco D’Oleire | NTNU | | + | |15:30 | Sensitivity and cross-talk for Q-estimation |
| - | |15:50 | Ocean ambient noise for seabed characterization | Hefeng Dong | NTNU | | + | |15:50 | Ocean ambient noise for seabed characterization |
| - | |16:10 | Iterative signal decomposition and time-frequency representation using singular spectrum analysis | Bjørn Ursin | NTNU | | + | |16:10 | Iterative signal decomposition and time-frequency representation using singular spectrum analysis |
| == 16:30 Summary and adjourn == | == 16:30 Summary and adjourn == | ||
Page Tools
Department of Geoscience and Petroleum
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
